Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Europe's adoration of Obama not necessarily good

Published: Thursday, April 9, 2009

Updated: Friday, April 10, 2009 01:04

Like many Democrats, President Barack Obama has a serious man-crush on Europe. With government-sponsored health care, powerful labor unions, oppressive environmental policies, and high tax rates, Europe is everything that liberals want for the United States. Many, I'm sure, would prefer the shorter work week, envy the fancier food and clothing and would love to sit around in a turtleneck, eating granola and reading Marx all day.

Obama returns from his first European tour this week. The trip must have been an ego-booster for the president. Huge throngs of people, and even sometimes reporters practically chanted, "We're not worthy!" as Obama walked around.

The goal of this visit was supposed to be to shore up ties with our allies, but the tour ended up being one long apology to Europeans because we are not more like them.

At a town hall meeting in Strasbourg, France, Obama called the U.S. arrogant, dismissive and derisive. Yeah, Europe, sorry for bailing you out of two world wars and then helping you rebuild after them. We apologize for opposing the expansion of Soviet communism, for providing the bulk of NATO - which is much more useful to you than us - and now for offering you monetary help to end the financial crisis. That was all so arrogant of us.

Then it was off to the Czech Republic, where Obama merrily announced that he sought "a world without nuclear weapons." He might as well have gone a little further and called for the end of evil in general - it has about the same chance of happening. The cat's out of the bag on nukes, folks; we can't just suddenly pretend nobody knows how to make them.

Obama then said, "As the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act." This implies, of course, that all of our nuclear problems stem from us dropping the bomb on Hiroshima in 1945. It ignores the fact that the Japanese and the Germans were developing such weapons at the same time.

A 1945 study by the Joint Chiefs of Staff estimated that the bombings saved more than 1 million lives - both American and Japanese - because of the high casualty toll an invasion of Japan would have caused. And don't forget the 60 years and counting of relative peace and prosperity under the U.S. nuclear umbrella. Sorry, world — our bad.

During the election, I heard more than one Obama supporter say, "I just want the rest of the world to like us." It's true that increasing the world's respect for us would be a useful foreign policy goal. But while Obama's approval rating in Europe has reached 85 percent, it is only around 40 percent overall in the U.S., according to a February BBC poll. In the New York Times, the editor of a German newspaper wrote that Obama was popular in Europe because he was so un-American. So don't mistake Europe's adoration of Obama for respect toward his country.

Despite his rock-star crowds, Obama's trip failed to deliver on some important goals. Britain declined to spend more money for world financial recovery and NATO pledged to send only 5,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, while the U.S. is committing more 20,000 of its own. Obviously, Obama's popularity doesn't always sway Europe's leaders.

Don't get me wrong - we need the world's respect. But Obama should cultivate those feelings by standing true to the values that made us great, not apologizing for them.

Tim Hadachek is a junior in political science. Please send comments to opinion@spub.ksu.edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments Log in to Comment

Your name
Fri Apr 10 2009 21:35
good article, I still read the Collegian, even from SoCal.....
Unfortunately I cannot express my dislike in California, especially as a government employee representing NASA-Dryden Flight Research Center concerning our current government's stance regarding Orion, retiring the space shuttles, relying on the Russians for FIVE years, Ares I and Ares V....etc....but I can comment on his "rock star" status and my personal experiences from my travels to Europe and across the world. I was in Berlin one week before Obama showed and the place was a ridiculously crazy concerning his appearance. The funniest occurrence was when he proposed his speech location in front of Brandenburg Gate, which was quickly greeted with a resounding NO from the German government. The equivalent would be a French candidate asking to speak in front of the White House, promoting his campaign and bid to rule his country. My German friends, who I am still in contact with and will be visiting them in the fall when I fulfill an internship commitment with their version of NASA, the DLR, are hopeful with our new president, but unfortunately do not have a deeper understanding of what kind of trouble is ahead of us. The Germans, for the most part, are completely on board with putting up a missile shield in Europe, with proposals of putting silos in Poland and the radar tracking system in Czech Republic. Their only concern is that the Russians must have the same technology, which I just simply laughed at. We are America, and we strive to have that ACE in the HOLE at our disposal(concerning advancements in technology, especially military related). Unfortunately, through a gesture of pure ignorance and stupidity, Obama informally came up with the idea that we would forgo our desire to place this missile shield in Europe to watch over our allies, if Russia would help America and our allies with reliable supply routes into Afghanistan. This is only one of many examples where eight years of hard work and dedication/determination to place such a system can cut and forgotten. Moving on, my friend Harry and I visited his Czech friends both in Prague and in the countryside for a couple of days and I gathered what they thought of the situation. Unfortunately they do not like the idea of putting a radar installation in their country to track the missiles and ICMBs that might rain down Europe someday. Quite frankly I feel like we are taking advantage of them, but that's America for ya. Obama's "rock star" status unfortunately blinds the main media stream, and he seems to say a lot of idiotic ideas and scenarios with no idea of the consequences involved. My rant is over.

*Note concerning myself: Currently at Edwards AFB, home of the Air Force's Test Pilot School, so I get to drive by everything currently in our Air Force's arsenal, including the excessively expensive F-22s...but boy, they sure look cool!

Don
Fri Apr 10 2009 21:10
John B wrote Barack Obama had to apologize for the multitude of lies, murder, war crimes, financial and data manipulation....

Wow...do you even mildly like this country? Is there anything we can do aside from throw our hands in the air and apologize to everyone who ever lived no matter who they are? Never in my life have I been confronted by so many people who despise the very land they live in.

Great Article...I love it when Obama is exposed for the American hating apologist he is...and I like it even better when his cronies like John B come out of the woodwork and show how much they truly hate America...Open your eyes folks...Anyone but Obama 2012!!!!

Your name
Fri Apr 10 2009 15:46
Another solid article Tim, nice work.
Frank S
Fri Apr 10 2009 15:16
The extreme right wing Limbaugh groupies never give up, do they?yb
Drew
Fri Apr 10 2009 14:54
john b, I totally agree with you. It's easy to say that Europe sucks while you're sitting in the middle of Kansas, far away from the world's problems. Tim you said that we can't stop the proliferation of nuclear arms across the globe because we can't pretend that nobody knows how to make them. An important fact here that might be beneficial to your argument is that when someone is making a nuclear weapon, it's pretty obvious. We can't take away nukes from people that already have them, but we can prevent countries like Iran and North Korea from obtaining production capacity. The technology, scientists, and physical space required to build such weapons are hard to miss. The biggest threat right now is not nuclear war, but a nuclear attack, terrorist or otherwise. We obviously can't stop "evil", but we can stop them from having nuclear weapons.
Tim Hadachek
Fri Apr 10 2009 11:03
I usually think its bad form to comment on my own column, but in this case I think its important. In the third to last paragraph, the sentence I originally wrote read like this:

"But while Obama’s approval rating in Europe nearly touches 85%, only around 40% have favorable feelings towards the U.S. overall, according to a February BBC poll."

The Collegian editors misunderstood what I was trying to say. Hope this clears it up.

Carry on.

John b
Fri Apr 10 2009 09:13
Barack Obama had to apologize for the multitude of lies, murder, war crimes, financial and data manipulation, racism and hate our country perpetrated around the globe in the past eight years under the guise and false flag of terrorism. When and if he gets around to the crimes both your criminal forfathers and his grandfathers perpetrated in the past four hundred years to steal land we will see how liberal he really is. Meanwhile live a bit and remove your mouth from the tet of capitalism and the limp phallus of republicrat ideology and you will see there is a world outside of Kansas. It has nothing to do with WWII except the birth of the military industrial complex and it links to modern policy.
Vincent
Fri Apr 10 2009 08:53
It's amazing how quickly the Europeans forgot. They simply need to look back and see the contrast between the USSR and the United States. After any war the US is involved, our "former enemies" get their country rebuild and soon enough begin to enjoy life as Americans. The USSR did what? put up walls from other countries and didn't give a rip of even their own people. So much so, remember "Gorbie tear down that wall" and it made sense. President Obama and his gang (including those who voted for him) should go live in Russia. Stay there a few months and wait to see if they don't want to come back to the States.
Jim_NH
Fri Apr 10 2009 08:50
I once read that in youth and beauty, wisdom is rare. Tim, you proved me wrong. While I'm not going anywhere near the beauty part, your article is very well written and very surprising when considering the source. Keep up the good work
hellfire
Fri Apr 10 2009 08:48
I agree with hoffman, very very skewed toward nationalism..
Darrell
Fri Apr 10 2009 08:09
The US has not always done the right thing in many situations. But President Obama would not be our leader now if the US had not pushed for the rights of people. I know we have been backward in some ways and people have been very hurt in this country. But why is it that the european countries are trying to get out of socialism? It does not work. Before he paints us as some horrible horde he needs to remember that he sets the stage for how people around the world look at us. He is supposed to be a leader, not every ones buddy.
Your name
Fri Apr 10 2009 08:09
COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER. I GIVE OBAMA ANOTHER FEW MONTHS TO SEE HIS POPULARITY AMONG US FURTHER DECLINE..... HE REMINDS ME OF THE POPE MAKING WONDERFUL STATEMENTS WITHOUT ANY RESULTS.
Hoffman
Fri Apr 10 2009 08:08
Your world view is decidedly skewed toward nationalism.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In