Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

K-State campus not likely to become smoke-free anytime soon

Published: Friday, May 7, 2010

Updated: Friday, May 7, 2010 15:05

Smoking is prohibited inside all K-State buildings and within 30 feet of marked entrances to university buildings.

"If smoking were banned on campus, it would be a healthier environment for everyone," said Jordan Carpenter, freshman in fisheries and wildlife conservation biology. "I don't want to have to be around secondhand smoke and breathe it in when I walk to class."

Secondhand smoke is not only bothersome; it is also harmful and sometimes deadly. According to the National Cancer Institute's website, Cancer.gov, secondhand smoke kills 38,000 Americans every year.

Another harmful aspect to the smoking habit is the several trillion cigarette butts that are littered every year, according to Cigarettelitter.org. In fact, cigarettes are the most littered item in America.

"I would support a smoking ban on campus if for no other reason than to eliminate the litter from cigarette butts," said Alison Coulman, freshman in pre-vet.

According to the American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation website, No-smoke.org, as of April 10, there are at least 394 campuses that are 100 percent smoke free. Their list includes two higher-level schools in Kansas, Butler Community College in Andover and Kansas Wesleyan University in Salina.

If students wished to propose that current smoking regulations be tightened, Vice President of Student Life and Dean of Students Pat Bosco said they would first need to talk to members of the Student Senate and ask them to build a policy. The decision to pass the policy would ultimately be decided by K-State President Kirk Schulz and his cabinet.

Though no action has been proposed recently to change smoking regulations at K-State, this semester the Union Governing Board reversed a 50-year policy and banned tobacco sales at the K-State Student Union.

Bosco said he does not feel that stricter regulations are necessary to curb the problems.

"If tighter smoking bans are passed, that would just be one more thing to regulate," he said. "It doesn't always have to be a government issue. If someone's smoking bothers me, I politely ask him to blow the other way. I've never had a problem with them respecting me."

Some students agree and feel they are well within their rights to smoke on campus.

"I pay to use the campus," said Beth Holz, junior in political science. "I should be allowed to smoke, a perfectly legal habit. I feel that I have as much of a right to smoke in public as someone would to eat unhealthy food or drink a beer in public."

Holz said she feels if someone has a problem with her smoking, he or she can walk faster or take another route.

The majority of college-age smokers, however, want to quit. According to the Washington College website, Washcoll.edu, 70 percent of smokers would quit right now if they thought they would be successful.

What many do not realize is that most colleges and universities have programs in place to help smokers quit.

K-State's Lafene Health Center offers a student smoking cessation program called K-Staters Inspired to Stop Smoking, aka K.I.S.S.

"K.I.S.S. is a free program that offers support and assistance for students trying to quit smoking," said Carol Kennedy, director of health promotions in Lafene. "It follows the American Lung Association program. You set up four different appointments at the health center: one before you quit smoking, one the day you quit and two follow-up appointments after."

The program includes support groups, one-on-one sessions and e-mail and phone support as well as nicotine replacement therapy such as nicotine patches, nicotine gum and the nicotine inhaler. K.I.S.S. also offers tips such as the "4 Ds." The "Ds" are deep breaths, drink lots of water, do something else and delay the urge.

 

To comment on this article, please visit our online forum: forums.kstatecollegian.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Tue May 11 2010 11:09
I applaud the above information and the person who took the time to do the research. I also understand that non-smokers do find the smell disgusting. However, as a smoker all I have to say is this. My medical insurance was raised $40 per month. I am willing to pay that without complaining. I have been regulated to smoking outside in any kind of weather. That too I am willing to do. If someone who does not smoke stands near me, I either move or ask them if it bothers them. If I go to supper, or out to a bar, I accept the rule to go outside to smoke. So what I really want to say is this. I have done everything that has been asked or mandated of me as a smoker....so leave me alone!!!!!
Ivy league intellect
Sat May 8 2010 22:47
regulation isn't an issue without socialized medical costs. now that the socialized medical programs are set to expand you can BET - bet me i dare you - the self-righteous politicians and such will be outlawing all SORTS of stuff in the future. let's see, it says here in the 2015 budget that 20% of our public healthcare costs are being spent on fat people. OK, well obviously we need to discourage anything to do with being fat....so, first we will tax the hell out of fast food, candy, and the like, then if that is not enough we will give tax breaks on people who can produce a copy of their gym membership to the local authorization board....what else....OH right, silly me, we will scale back benefits if you fall into a certain "undesirable" weight class, providing further incentive to stay fit. And THAT'S THAT! it's so easy being a central planner, i love my life! La, la, la, la, la......yeah=)
Anonymous
Sat May 8 2010 12:37
"I would like to take the time"???

How much "time" does it take to post this same massive boilerplate spam all over the internet (google the text)? What garbage. Check out the wikipedia item,

"Industry-funded Studies and Critiques"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondhand_smoke#Industry-funded_studies_and_critiques)

Anonymous
Sat May 8 2010 01:49
The new Tobacco Prohibition I would like to take the time to tell the entire community about a falsehood so big that everyone who believes in freedom should be appauled. This falsehood is so big it resonates from historical fact forward to this day. This falsehood is so big billions of dollars have been spent to make it believable to those of us who dont take the time to look up the facts. We all remember reading about alcohol prohibition,but did you know there was also tobacco prohibition going on before alcohol became such a target of the last nanny staters. Our great grandparents lived thru prohibition and the great depression,they also lived thru tobacco prohibition. Heres a time line starting in 1900,dont be surprised to see the same thing playing out today nearly 100 years later.1901: REGULATION: Strong anti-cigarette activity in 43 of the 45 states. "Only Wyoming and Louisiana had paid no attention to the cigarette controversy, while the other forty-three states either already had anti-cigarette laws on the books or were considering new or tougher anti-cigarette laws, or were the scenes of heavy anti- cigarette activity" (Dillow, 1981:10).1904: New York: A judge sends a woman is sent to jail for 30 days for smoking in front of her children. 1904: New York City. A woman is arrested for smoking a cigarette in an automobile. "You can't do that on Fifth Avenue," the arresting officer says.1907: Business owners are refusing to hire smokers. On August 8, the New York Times writes: "Business ... is doing what all the anti-cigarette specialists could not do." 1917: SMOKEFREE: Tobacco control laws have fallen, including smoking bans in numerous cities, and the states of Arkansas, Iowa, Idaho and Tennessee.1937: hitler institutes laws against smoking.This one you can google. Now onto the falsehood......We have been told for years by smoke free advocates that second hand smoke is the cause of everything from johnnys ear ache to cousin ED'S lung cancer. But wheres the proof!!!Remember they claim 50,000 deaths a year yet,there are no bodys not even mass graves of the dead to second hand smoke.We await the names of these victims. A simple stroll down historys road say 10 years or so and we start to get at the truth...... A federal Judge by the name of osteen got a case dropped in his lap in North Carolina,the case was that of EPA'S study on second hand smoke/environmental tobacco smoke.The judge an anti-tobbaco judge by reputation spent 4 years going thru the study and interviewing scientists at EPA and came to the conclusion : JUNK SCIENCE''EPA's 1992 conclusions are not supported by reliable scientific evidence. The report has been largely discredited and, in 1998, was legally vacated by a federal judge.Before its 1992 report, EPA had always used epidemiology's gold standard CI of 95 percent to measure statistical significance. But because the U.S. studies chosen[cherry picked] for the report were not statistically significant within a 95 percent CI, for the first time in its history EPA changed the rules and used a 90 percent CI, which doubled the chance of being wrong.This allowed it to report a statistically significant 19 percent increase [a 1.19rr] of lung cancer cases in the nonsmoking spouses of smokers over those cases found in nonsmoking spouses of nonsmokers. Even though the RR was only 1.19--an amount far short of what is normally required to demonstrate correlation or causality--the agency concluded this was proof SHS increased the risk of U.S. nonsmokers developing lung cancer by 19 percent.'' So here we find that second hand smoke was made a political scapegoat by EPA.Lets not forget how EPA has reworked the global warming studys just this last summer. Where its top scientists paper was rebuked because it didnt carry the EPA'S stand that global warming was real. The political shenanigans surrounding SHS/ETS go deep not only with the government and its health agencies but also to the big pharmaceutical companies and non-profit orginizations aka ACS,ALA,AHA and a meriad of others. All lobbying for smoking bans and their weapon of choise Propaganda paid for by big pharma and tax dollars. Studys made to order that second hand smoke is deadly. Take a memory note here too,over 250 studys on shs/ets have found it safe. Yet a simple look at the chemistry shows us that its: About 90% of secondary smoke is composed of water vapor and ordinary air with a minor amount of carbon dioxide. The volume of water vapor of second hand smoke becomes even larger as it qickly disperses into the air,depending upon the humidity factors within a set location indoors or outdoors. Exhaled smoke from a smoker will provide 20% more water vapor to the smoke as it exists the smokers mouth. 4 % is carbon monoxide. 6 % is those supposed 4,000 chemicals to be found in tobacco smoke. Unfortunatley for the smoke free advocates these supposed chemicals are more theorized than actually found.What is...






log out