Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

SOPA, PIPA too broad to pass, professor says

managing editor

Published: Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Updated: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 23:01

SOPA and PIPA – the two acronyms and Congress bills that have sparked heavy Internet debates. Production companies and music industries want their copyrighted material protected, but big name websites are concerned about the acts' ability to damage the free Internet. These acts have had Facebook and Twitter talking about a blackout. Multiple websites, including Wikipedia, protested on Wednesday for 24 hours. But what are these bills all about?

SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act, and PIPA, the Protect Intellectual Property Act, were written with the incentive to stop the copying of movies, music and TV shows. In the eyes of the big name websites, it's a case of Internet censorship.

According to the New York Daily News, the bills are intended to eliminate theft online and would give copyright holders the authority to penalize websites that host pirated content. Internet Protocol (IP) addresses would be required to block all use of websites that contain copyright violations.

"The big Internet providers are the critics, while those for [the bills] are the production companies," said Louise Benjamin, professor of journalism and mass communications.

In fact, big name websites such as Wikipedia, Reddit and Wordpress shut down all access to their content. Each site provided statements in protest of the U.S. legislation acts, stating they threaten the free and open Internet. Most websites also urge users to contact their state representatives. Other large Internet providers like Google, TwitPic and Tumblr have blacked out their company logos in protest.

In a formal statement released by Sue Gardner, executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, she said:

"My hope is that when Wikipedia shuts down on Jan. 18, people will understand that we're doing it for our readers. We support everyone's right to freedom of thought and freedom of expression. We think everyone should have access to educational material on a wide range of subjects, even if they can't pay for it. We believe in a free and open Internet where information can be shared without impediment."

However, SOPA and PIPA were created for and backed by music industries and production companies. And while John Uthoff, associate professor of community studies, theatre and dance, said he is not familiar with all proposed SOPA rules, he cannot see how pirating copyrighted material would be a freedom of speech issue.

"If the artist that develops the songs, movies, books or computer programs cannot get paid for their creativity, there is no incentive for them to develop any artistic work," Uthoff said. "Just because creative work is not an object, using it without permission is still wrong."

Uthoff said that many artists are OK with posting and sharing their work on the Internet, but the decision is entirely their choice.

"It is not the same as someone else deciding to do it for them without their permission," he said.

Benjamin agreed that there is a need to protect intellectual property; however, the proposed bills are too general. There must be more verification and specifics in the action Congress plans to take.

"I doubt very much that SOPA and PIPA will go into effect because they are too broad," Benjamin said. "In my opinion, it would shut down the way the Web operates."

She said that should these laws go into effect, access to information and the Internet could potentially be affected.

However, the Internet blackout could open a lot of eyes for people unaware of the SOPA and PIPA acts.

"It is one way to let the public know what's going on because a lot of times people have no idea," Benjamin said.

Scott Louis, freshman in general agriculture, said he uses Google on a day-to-day basis, so if the provider were to black out completely, it would affect minor searches. However, if the blackout were to only last 24 hours, he would not be too worried.

"One day won't hurt me," Louis said.

Whether the Internet blackouts are enough to stop the acts will remain to be seen. According to abcsnews.com, a vote for PIPA is scheduled for Jan. 24. Until then, the gloves are off.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

9 comments Log in to Comment

Anonymous
Fri Jan 20 2012 11:26
Do any of you guys have the guts to call Lamar Smith's office and deluge his secretary with messages? This may give the old Bible thumping fanatic a clue that internet is NOT his area of expertise and he should keep his grubby hands off. Call the office....its accessible. Ask to talk to him. I did. I was going to give the man a piece of my mind. You want a free country? Exercise your civil rights then instead of sitting on your butts.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 19 2012 23:57
I find it quite worrying that this is the sort of thing the Government are wasting their time with when There are so many more serious issues they could be trying to sort out like poverty, equal marriage rights, global warming, sexual harassment etc. If this bill passes I will be extremely disappointed, the online world as we know it would be a completely different place.
StephyUK
Thu Jan 19 2012 19:44
What I fear is that if these laws pass then riots, wars ect. will break out. I always thought America was the land of the free. Now it's starting to look like New China.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 19 2012 19:28
The government can impose "time, place, manner" regulations for infringing upon free speech rights under our first amendment but cannot ban all of it totally. This is highly unconstitutional. There are 67 mega-giant corporations opposing these 2 bills, they have all the money to take this issue to court (possibly to U.S.Supreme Court) and have it struck down. That's why we have our constitution policing our rights and not just bunch of drunk congressmen and congresswomen who have nothing better to do but to come up with stupid bills.
Nick
Thu Jan 19 2012 15:21
This Bill is HIGHLY unconstitutional. It wouldn't be much of a "free country" if Congress decided what we can or cannot look at on the internet. I personally, do use certain wikis for games and I am well aware that these wikis may be taken down even though they may not be violating the contents of this bill. If this bill is passed, that will throw the country into chaos and cause major protesting, and maybe even riots. Many have not noticed this, but Congress is slowly dwindling American's rights.
Boss
Thu Jan 19 2012 12:47
We as Humans have the right to choose and we say no, there is more than enough proof that the enforcee's of this act have actually violated it themselves over the years many many times. We have a right to choose and I say no. This goes against our right to choose.
Sean
Thu Jan 19 2012 08:48
This SOPA / PIPA bill is making me loose sleep at night. I will be so disgusted if this passes. I have done everything I can by emailing most of the congress people, but still feel that the greed of washington might cause this to pass. God help us all!!!
Anonymous
Thu Jan 19 2012 00:48
The will of America is pretty clear - we don't want SOPA / PIPA. If congressmen/women truly represent the voice of the people, this nightmare wont make it. But that's not the question. The real question is whether a large enough percentage of congress are corrupt enough to put lobbying dollars ahead of duty. Some obviously are, some are not. This vote is definitely a gauge of our country's health - whether or not the Constitution and the duties it assigns the government still hold sway. It will certainly be interesting to see where the undecided chips fall.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 19 2012 00:37
If this passes there will be major protesting and it shows that our rights to do what we want are being challenged

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In