Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Speaker criticizes lies behind U.S. helping Israel

campus editor

Published: Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 08:10

10-6-10

Matt Binter

Kenneth O’Keefe, former U.S. Marine, Gulf War veteran, and prominent organizer of the Free Gaza Movement, speaks in Forum Hall on Tuesday evening. O’Keefe criticized American support of Israel.

Tear gas filled the air, Israeli militants fired off rounds from snipers and percussion grenades went off all around. A 19-year-old American photographer holding his camera up to catch the moment was shot dead from helicopters above.

This was the scene aboard the MV Mavi Marmara, painted by Kenneth O'Keefe, ex-U.S. Marine and activist, in his speech at K-State on Tuesday night.

A flotilla of six ships, raided by Israeli militants on May 31, was en route to a blockade of the Gaza Strip while bringing humanitarian aid and supplies to the region.

Nine passengers aboard MV Mavi Marmara were killed in the raid. O'Keefe and others on the flotilla were arrested and detained by Israeli security, where O'Keefe said they were left without food and water and beaten.

As an activist, O'Keefe speaks out against American imperialism and its support of Israel in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Although an American-born citizen, he is now a resident of London and a citizen of Ireland.

"The power of indoctrination is not something to be overstated. It is very dangerous and it allows us to be manipulated, to be ignorant enough to support things that don't benefit us."

This was O'Keefe's message as he spoke in Forum Hall in the K-State Student Union on Tuesday night.

O'Keefe said the ability of the media and government to use propaganda to further their agenda is one of the most dangerous parts of the world today. He said many events in history, like U.S. involvement in WWII and the Vietnam War, have been direct results of false information given to the American people.

He said the situation is no different for the war in Iraq.

"The fact is we invaded on a pack of lies, and those lies were well-known to those of us who had our eyes open and looked beyond the mass media, the propaganda machine," he said. "That invasion, that occupation has led to an amount of suffering that can be hard to fathom for us."

O'Keefe said the real reason for the invasion of Iraq was not because of weapons of mass destruction, but rather to establish permanent military bases in the region and to take control of the oil reserves.

O'Keefe became a U.S. Marine at the age of 19 and served in the Gulf War. He said he saw the abuse of power firsthand in the military and has dedicated his life to fighting crimes against humanity.

One topic he has spoken about and fought for is the rights of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, and the right the Palestinians have to what is present-day Israel.

After WWII and the harsh treatment Jews faced, the United Nations designated land in Palestinian territory for them to settle. This U.N. partition allocated more than half the territory to the 15 percent of Jews in the area, and left the 83-percent Palestinian population to live in the rest of the region, now present-day Israel. Over the last six decades, the Palestinians have continued to lose land and have been forced into smaller and smaller portions of the region.

"One of the many lies that is being told over and over again is that this is a conflict that has been around for thousands of years, it's about religion and it's about the terrorists that want to drive all the Jews out to sea. That is a lie," O'Keefe said. "The real problem is the theft of land and denial of human rights and killing of innocent people."

O'Keefe denounced the support the American government gives to Israel, and said by supporting them and giving them weapons, the American government is aiding the problem.

"Can we believe that those people who are defending themselves in their homeland are the terrorists and we somehow are innocent?" he said. "It is exactly the opposite. We are the terrorists and we are funding state-sponsored terrorism."

O'Keefe said the American people and those around the world are being withheld the truth about the conflict. He said the truth is the Palestinian people are simply defending the land that is rightly theirs, but they are portrayed in the media as the enemy.

"If you believe the narrative, if you believe the propaganda, basically the Palestinians are a bunch of radical fundamentalist, Islamic freaks that want to kill all the Jews and hate us for our freedom, and that's who they are," he said. "The Palestinian people are much more patient, much more compassionate, much more humane than we are by any stretch."

O'Keefe said the Palestinians treat Americans with open arms. He said they will share everything they own, treat Americans as honored guests, and all they ask for is a basic amount of respect in return.

He said the one solution for the conflict would be one state, with equal rights for every person.

"I would argue that one of the most important things that we as people need to do is expand our circle of compassion and to see people all around the world as our family," he said.

Those in the audience gave O'Keefe a standing ovation after his speech, and many students in the audience said they were glad they took the time to come and listen to the speech.

Maxwell Gabel, junior in psychology, history and political science, said O'Keefe's openness and bluntness about the topic was refreshing.

"It was a lot more interesting than I expected," he said. "It was definitely worth my time."

O'Keefe's straight-forward approach was appreciated by many in the audience, but some felt his biased approach created problems as well.

"I think there's a bigger picture than the side he presents," said Amanda Perser, freshman in open option. "He also is relying on the very tactic that he condemns. I think it's a good way to deliver his viewpoint — it's also a good way to get people riled up when they don't believe the same thing."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

Anonymous
Mon Dec 13 2010 12:15
It's not widely known, but Eichmann sought to resettle the jews in the east. The ungoing war with Britain made that plan untennable. The Brittish preferred that the jews be settled in Palestine, because Britain knew of the oil reserves in the middle east.
Anonymous
Fri Oct 15 2010 04:21
Israel is nothing but a communist terrorist State and totally a welfare terrorist State dependent upon the USA. Congress sends many billions of our money to Israel every year, and they send some of it back to bribe our Congressmen and other officials, to control our government. The criminals running Israel are the same communist criminals who did the Bolshevik revolution in Russia back in 1917. Smart jews like Albert Einstein have always opposed this communist terrorist State of Zionist Israel. It is most certainly NOT God's Israel. It is just some communist criminals using religion to fool the world's idiots, to further their aims of world tyranny.
Anonymous
Sat Oct 9 2010 14:51
Pauline, K-State and the Collegian must be really proud. This article is making the rounds at many Jihad supporting, Jew hating websites.
Anonymous
Sat Oct 9 2010 12:55
Following World War II, recently independent Arab/Muslim nations expelled 800,000 Jewish citizens who had lived in those countries for hundreds of years. The only place these Jews had to go was Israel. They are never mentioned, nor is it argued that they have a "right to return." When the Arab countries launched their genocidal war against Israel (which continues to this day), the Israelis did what they had to in self-defense. Many of the "Palestinian" refugees left their homes voluntarily because they thought their side was going to win and then they could join in the looting of Jewish property. Of course the Jew haters on this board don't care about all the facts. The Collegian and K-State must be so proud printing/supporting anti-Semitic lies. I hope alumni/donors are informed.
Anonymous
Sat Oct 9 2010 02:18
This guy should have given a Landon Lecture, but they only get Zionists to speak there. This guy tells the truth!! American government is now totally criminal, and being run by a cabal of Zionist criminals.
Anonymous
Sat Oct 9 2010 02:02
I've read a lot of Ken O'Keefe on various websites. I firmly believe he's nothing more than a professional activist whose comments regarding Israel and the blatent misrepresentations he makes do nothing more than hurt the forward movement of the Palestinian People.

No one can argue that Israel handled the Gaza boat very well, but unlike the other 'blockade busters' that followed, this one was out to make trouble which they got in spades.

I think this fellow is misguided and encourage people to read his writings to see the nonsense he routinely spews.

Anonymous
Fri Oct 8 2010 19:01
Jews owned barely 6% of the land of Palestine before Israel became a state. Israel destroyed 550 Palestinian villages during 47-48. Non Jewish Israeli citizens in israel cannot buy land from State of Israel . Israel has never allowed the refugees purged 47-48 to return to those empty villages. None of the refugees have been paid reparations for their losses based on ethnic cleansing of Palestine by Zionist terrorists who later became Israel's leaders. 80 % of Gaza residents are refugees from pre 1948 Israel.
Anonymous
Thu Oct 7 2010 22:04
Dear moron below, Israel didn't exist until 1948.
Anonymous
Thu Oct 7 2010 13:30
Dear person below me, you are hopelessly naive please refrain from posting. Israel hasn't legitimately acquired land in the last 500 years.
Anonymous
Thu Oct 7 2010 12:37
Arabs living in Israel have far greater rights than Arabs living in Arabia, particularly women. How did the Jewish immigrants "steal" the land they legally purchased during the period of the Ottoman Empire and the British Mandate?
Anonymous
Thu Oct 7 2010 12:34
"The summer of 1929 was one of unrest in Palestine. Jewish-Arab tensions were spurred on by the agitation of the mufti in Jerusalem. Just one day prior to the start of the Hebron massacre, three Jews and three Arabs were killed in Jerusalem when fighting broke out after a Muslim prayer service on the Temple Mount. Arabs spread false rumors throughout their communities, saying that Jews were carrying out "wholesale killings of Arabs." Meanwhile, Jewish immigrants were arriving in Palestine in increasing numbers, further exacerbating the Jewish-Arab conflict."

Why do liberals lecture Americans on their alleged hostility to immigrants, demand that the borders be erased and refuse to distinguish between illegal and legal immigration while making excuses for Arab xenophobia and hatred of Jewish immigrants? Why do they ignore the hundreds-of-thousands Jews who were ejected from numerous middle-eastern countries by Arabs and Moslems and had no choice but to emigrate to Israel? Liberals are going to have to do better than spout inane talking points in order to defend Hamas and Hizballah.

Anonymous
Wed Oct 6 2010 22:56
Good for the KS Collegian for posting the truth of the matter. Ken O'Keefe lives what he says. He disarmed two Israeli commandos on the Mavi Marmara last spring and, unlike the commandos, didn't kill an unarmed man.

"One of the many lies that is being told over and over again is that this is a conflict that has been around for thousands of years, it's about religion and it's about the terrorists that want to drive all the Jews out to sea. That is a lie," O'Keefe said. "The real problem is the theft of land and denial of human rights and killing of innocent people."

Anonymous
Wed Oct 6 2010 16:54
"I would like to call your attention to the fact that it would be very appropriate and more advantageous to prevent the Jews from emigrating from your country and instead to send them where they will be placed under strict control: e.g. to Poland [i.e. Auschwitz]. Thus one can avoid the danger they represent and do a good deed vis-à-vis the Arab peoples that will be appreciated." The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem to the Bulgarian Foreign Minister, 6 May 1943.

Anyone care to discuss the "historical lies" cited by O'Keefe??????

Anonymous
Wed Oct 6 2010 16:50
"Germany stands for an uncompromising struggle against the Jews. It is self-evident that the struggle against the Jewish national homeland in Palestine forms part of this struggle, since such a national homeland would be nothing other than a political base for the destructive influence of Jewish interests. Germany also knows that the claim that Jewry plays the role of an economic pioneer in Palestine is a lie. Only the Arabs work there, not the Jews. Germany is determined to call on the European nations one by one to solve the Jewish problem and, at the proper moment, to address the same appeal to non-European peoples." [Adolf Hitler to Haj Amin Al-Husseini, mufti of Jerusalem, November 28, 1941] They spent some quality time together in Berlin. [Klaus Gensicke, Der Mufti von Jerusalem und die Nationalsozialisten (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2007), 60-61.]
Anonymous
Wed Oct 6 2010 16:48
"Under Husseini's direction, teams of Arab saboteurs were parachuted into Iraq, Transjordan and Palestine, where they attacked Allied facilities such as telephone lines, pipelines, bridges and railways. One such sabotage team was armed with a substantial quantity of poison that they were supposed to dump into the Tel Aviv water system. (In a separate but related matter, the Mufti repeatedly urged the Germans to bomb Tel Aviv and Jerusalem "in order to injure Palestinian Jewry and for propaganda purposes in the Arab world," as his Nazi interlocutors put it. The proposals were rejected as militarily unfeasible." [Medoff, Rafael (1996). The Mufti's Nazi Years Re-examined. The Journal of Israeli History, vol. 17. No. 3,]
Anonymous
Wed Oct 6 2010 16:46
November 2, 1943 Himmler's telegram to Mufti: 'To the Grand Mufti: The National Socialist movement of Greater Germany has, since its inception, inscribed upon its flag the fight against the world Jewry. It has therefore followed with particular sympathy the struggle of freedom-loving Arabs, especially in Palestine, against Jewish interlopers. In the recognition of this enemy and of the common struggle against it lies the firm foundation of the natural alliance that exists between the National Socialist Greater Germany and the freedom-loving Muslims of the whole world. In this spirit I am sending you on the anniversary of the infamous Balfour declaration my hearty greetings and wishes for the successful pursuit of your struggle until the final victory.' Reichsfuehrer S.S. Heinrich Himmler
Anonymous
Wed Oct 6 2010 13:40
"The Grand Mufti's connections with the Nazis during the war were no secret; he had hoped they would help him in the implementation of some "final solution" in the Near East. Hence, newspapers in Damascus and Beirut, in Cairo and Jordan, did not hide their sympathy for Eichmann or their regret that he "had not finished the job...." That Arab nationalists have been in sympathy with Nazism is notorious, their reasons are obvious, and neither Ben-Gurion nor this trial was needed to "ferret them out"; they were never in hiding." [Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem, New York: Penguin Books, 1994, p. 13]

Google "Amin al-Husayni."

Anonymous
Wed Oct 6 2010 13:37
"After WWII and the harsh treatment Jews faced...." "Harsh treatment?!" So let's go there;

"Despite some weaknesses, the main thesis around which the authors have organized their book - that the Nazis by summer of 1942 had drawn up concrete plans to murder the Jews of the Yishuv and that, recognizing in Arab nationalist opinion an ideologically suitable ally, they expected their genocidal endeavour to be substantially assisted by Arab collaborators - is convincingly argued." [Johannes Due Enstad, Journal of Contemporary History, 2009; Vol. 44, No. 1] Review of "Crescent Moon and Swastika: The Third Reich, the Arabs, and Palestine," by Klaus-Michael Mallmann and Martin Cuppers.

juan
Wed Oct 6 2010 13:14
This headline is completely biased and misleading. One assumes reading the headline that the paper is suggesting this speaker was correct in his assertions and that Israel was indeed lying. Is that the position of this paper?

Israeli militants? Hardly. Try doing some research in addition to sitting through the lecture. Did you bother to ask why the Israelis were attempting to board the ship?

Did anyone bother to ask him about the "lies" that got us into WWII? No doubt there is some fantastic anti-Jewish rhetoric to be discovered there given his organization's penchant for skirting the line between faux-progressive nonsense and outright racism.

How does his service (referenced in the article) make him an authority on anything?

Did anyone ask how the Palestinian unguided rockets fired indiscriminately into Israeli territory qualifies as "defending itself?"

It is ironic that this speaker and this story references propaganda as an evil in society and yet the writer and this paper have bought into this organization's propaganda hook, line and sinker.

John Rudolph
Wed Oct 6 2010 12:50
"Israeli militants"
Nice spin. Makes people think the Israelis are the terrorists when in fact you and your little group were actually used as pathetic little pawns to help the palestinians bring in firearms and artillery not to defend themselves, but to use them against the peaceful citizens of Israel.

Your institution is a sham, allowing this spin of hate to be published. Grow up and learn the truth about this incident and stop basking in progressive liberal ignorance.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In