Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

A lobbying success story of milk: Unnatural, unhealthy, unwise

Published: Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 16:09

oped

Illustration by Ginger Pugh

Beth

Beth Mendenhall

Humans are the only animals on the planet that drink another animal's milk. Thus, by definition, drinking cows' milk is extremely unnatural.

Despite thousands of years of cattle domestication, the human digestive system hasn't even adapted to dairy consumption, which is why you probably can't do the "Gallon Challenge." 

In fact, 60 percent of adults worldwide are unable to effectively digest lactose, the main sugar found in milk. So why do Americans insist on consuming massive amounts of dairy products? Dairy industry propaganda and decades of lobbying have made us believe that milk "does a body good," when in fact it only increases the risk of disease and unhappiness for millions of humans and cows alike.

Milk's inclusion in the U.S. Department of Agriculture food pyramid is a direct result of ties to the dairy industry. Most non-Caucasian ethnic groups are almost completely lactose intolerant, yet receive all their required nutrients.

While our favorite, mucus-like mammary secretion does contain large amounts of calcium, that calcium is unlikely to be fully absorbed. Enzymes such as phosphatase, critical to calcium absorption, are completely destroyed by pasteurization.

This means that the calcium content on the label isn't what your body can utilize. The best sources of calcium are actually leafy green vegetables, like broccoli, collard greens, kale and spinach, which also come without the high proportion of saturated fat that contributes to obesity and heart disease.

Harvard studies have actually shown an increase in osteoporosis and bone-breakage in people who drink milk. The former chairman of pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University, Dr. Frank Oski, has identified hormone-ridden commercial milk as the cause of 60 percent of ear infections in kids under the age of 6. Milk consumption is the biggest cause of iron-deficiency anemia in children, according to the American Association of Pediatrics.

According to Mercola.com, the journal Medicine lists more than 1,500 papers dealing with milk consumption, and not one of them expounds its health benefits – this is because milk is made to fatten baby cows, not to be a health drink.

The conditions on modern dairy farms contribute to the inclusion of pus, blood and antibiotics in every tall, white glass of milk. Bovine Growth Hormone is banned in the European Union, but in the U.S., it is pumped into dairy cows to increase yields. The hormone increases incidents of mastitis, an udder infection that leaks pus into the cow's milk.

This means farmers have to treat cows with subtherapeutic antibiotics — those same antibiotics have been found in 38 percent of milk samples tested by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. This overconsumption of antibiotics contributes to drug resistance in bacteria that commonly affects human health. Thus, milk increases our risk of some diseases and makes it harder to recover from others.

Small, traditional dairy farms have been almost completely pushed out of the market by large corporations. Of the roughly 70,000 U.S. dairies, 4 percent of the farms produce about half of our milk. The near constant impregnation required to keep milk flowing, combined with the stress of losing one's calf the day it is born and the discomfort of a constantly swollen udder has reduced life expectancy of the average corporate dairy cow from 20-25 years to just 3-4 years.

And what a life those three years is. Fresh air, range of movement and social activity don't promote milk production as much as hormones, artificial insemination and confined conditions do.

Drink your milk, eat your cheese and enjoy your ice cream as much as you like. But don't believe the lie that dairy is good for your health. The mucus, blood, pus and antibiotics found in your average glass of milk are symptoms of a larger problem — the power and influence of an American dairy industry that doesn't care about the cows or your health as much as the bottom line.

Be wary of any information presented by those with a financial incentive to support the unnatural, unhealthy consumption of milk — including the Department of Agriculture.

-Beth Mendenhall is a senior in political science and philosophy. Please send comments to opinion@spub.ksu.edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

254 comments

Anonymous
Mon Dec 27 2010 02:02
Constitutional Conservative brags he's 6'1" 170lbs?
He must look like he got out of Aushwitz...
Well it is better that being a Fat slob
Anonymous
Thu Mar 11 2010 13:53
All I have to say is, THANK YOU CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVE! AMEN!
iLuvHondas
Fri Feb 19 2010 13:15
Okay, so stay with me here... Aphids and Ants have a very sweet relationship... The aphids like plants, the ants like aphids or more appropriately what comes out of the aphids. And the aphids don't mind as long as they get their green. Is this an unnatural phenomenon? Ants taking care of aphids and tickling them from time to time so they can juice them? I think not one bit... maybe the first time it happened between these two it could have been quite awkward to say the least... but as time went on they started doing it more and more, probably with different partners too! now look at them... just look at all of them... wow. I don't hear you complaining about that...
Sim Choo Kheng
Fri Feb 12 2010 01:46
Of course milk is unnatural to human beings, cow's milk is meant the calves and not you perverts. How do you like like your mothers, sisters or daughters be caged up by the cows and milked by them? Does anyone realise this whole dairy industry is a mass sexual abuse? Try soya milk, we drink a lot of this in the Far East.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 8 2010 10:23
Concerned Citizen-
Science proves that cattle produce LESS methane on corn and soy products that cattle that consume high-forage diets. It's in the literature, all you have to do is read and learn.

If everyone did not eat meat or drink milk from cattle in CAFOs, millions more would starve.

Your name
Sun Oct 18 2009 06:29
The attractive young lady Beth is correct in many things. However, we native American white folks have a long history drinking milk and doing just fine with it. Drinking milk is scriptural. Eating blood is not. Corporate dairy farming and agribusiness is the problem. Raw milk is far more healthy for us than pasteurized milk. Raw milk has live enzymes which help digest it. Raw milk even has live white blood cells and antibodies in it, which help us fight off intestinal infections. As someone else said, the only healthy milk, is from grass fed cows, not these corporate cows fed high grain concentrates. You want your milk from a clean cow who lives on good pasture, who is given no hormones or antibiotics, who is free of Brucellosis and Tuberculosis and mastitis, and you want raw milk, not pasteurized and not homogenized milk. The best is a hand milked cow. The machines are hard on them, and it's very hard to keep all that machinery clean. The best is to have your own Jersey milk cow, or else be near a good Amish dairy.
Your name
Sat Oct 17 2009 22:23
Know what I did after reading this article? Poured myself a big tall glass of milk.
Your name
Sat Oct 17 2009 08:20
Milk smells......milky......We should start giving cows cocoa powder in their diets.....then wallah! Choco milk the "natural" way!
sandor
Thu Oct 15 2009 09:45
I thought that i would enlighten you to the benefits of raw milk from grass eating cows but it wasn't necessary. Others have done it for me.

www.realmilk.com

Don't but the government propaganda. Do your own research.

Read Weston Price's book, Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, or Ron Schmid's book, TheUntold Story of Milk .

arack
Wed Oct 14 2009 18:45
Well, Beth does at least take into effect some things, she doesn't present the other side of facts very well. One example is stating that U.S. Milk producers still continue to "pump" dairy cattle with rBGH (recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone, the full name). A strong consumer pullback forced grocers to ask suppliers to stop using them. Kroger (Dillons) and Walmart both have milk produced without rBGH. It is also in the long term benefit of milk producers not to use these hormones for the health of their cows and the sale of their milk. In theory, whole, raw and unpasteurized milk would be fairly healthy for us... at least our digestive systems. The enzymes would assist in digestion and in absorption of calcium as mentioned in the article. Unfortunately the dairy lobby along with producers of Genetically Modified seeds and crops has attempted and in some ways succeeded in stopping bottlers and distributors from labeling products as being non-genetically modified or injected with additional hormones. Europe has passed regulations REQUIRING the labeling of products containing rBGH or GM organisms.

Our alternatives would be better for the environment though. In addition to the small effects of methane by cows, we must consider emissions from machinery used to transport, process and bottle milk. Milk also requires constant refrigeration and expires much sooner than alternatives such as soy or rice milk. These and other alternatives are produced directly from the plant rather than going through a third party (cow). In biology this is similar to how energy flows through trophic levels and energy is lost as it passes each level.

Remember that water is a necessity for human life, I still have milk with my occasional bowl of cereal or for baking, but milk doesn't play a huge part of my life anymore. Reducing consumption is easy, but for Americans and much of the rest of the developed world, completely weaning ourselves from milk is not economically or socially feasible. For example, attempting to make a cake without it and it is a near foreign idea. Even 'add water only' mixes will have a dairy derivative in them.
Beth (who I didn't even know was a real person outside the Fourum) may have a good idea, but she is going at it in the wrong manner. She is ignorant on both details and the big picture. Forgive her, as terrible journalism is unfortunately one thing that comes with freedom of speech.
Aside from the fact of a bad writer, whether you do it to save money (a surprising amount) or to help out the environment or to improve your personal health, reducing milk consumption isn't a horrible idea... just saying.

Your name
Wed Oct 14 2009 17:41
Here I was looking at the title of the article thinking it was about Harvey Milk.

I was disappointed when I read the actual text.

Another Concerned Citizen
Wed Oct 14 2009 10:24
Dear Concerned Citizen-
Cattle fed in feedlot situations CAN and do digest corn and soy and their by-products, and do it more efficiently (i.e. more pounds produced in a shorter time) than grass-fed systems of the same scale. This is very widely known with many peer-reviewed research articles confirming this fact.

We've went over this before, Beth's claims in her article about livestock methane emissions are too high, compared to other studies. The EPA documents that cattle that are fed higher-quality feeds (i.e corn, milo) actually produce less methane. CAFOs are the most efficient way of producing a healthy, nutritious beef product for the world because of economies of scale.

These feedlots are highly-regulated. Unbiased, scientific-based government agencies are making these operations stay within limits set by the government.

According to the EPA, methane emissions from enteric fermentation has remained static for nearly twenty years. In 2007, agricultural activities were responsible for emissions of 413.1 Tg CO2 Eq., or 5.8 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.

And finally, yes, it IS that much to ask. Milk and animal protein has been a healthy staple of diets across the globe. Support your local dairy farmer and your local meat counter.

Plb
Tue Oct 13 2009 22:28
It does not take a 'rocket scientist' to realize that regular intake of milk is a terribly flawed idea. For what purpose did Nature create milk?... Those who say that humans drink milk because 'we can' must think that man can overcome Nature. No, man can adapt to Nature and 'work' with it, but he will never beat it or overcome it. Therefore, any thing that we do which is against the character of the natural world is bound to fail ultimately. But we seem inclined to learn the lessons the hard way... I was pleasantly surprised to see that this story was linked from a website that promotes gold and silver as sound money. It must be that people who come to realize the fallacies of fiat paper money are more open to an idea as 'radical' as dismissing the regular consumption of cow's milk. For, just like milk, we have been made to believe that fiat money is good for us and our economic health, in greater and greater quantities, when actually the complete opposite is true... What is the opposite of fiat money?... Throughout man's history, it has been silver and gold, which also happen to the only forms of money approved in the US Constitution.
Sabin Figaro
Tue Oct 13 2009 18:39
Making a lot of people angry. Must be getting close to the truth. Unfortunately you're preaching to the choir. Americans have absolutely no ability to critically think. Once they have their mind made up, you can only reinforce what we think or make them hostile. Too bad. If it's not on Fox News (fair and balanced, as long as it's 100% pro business) they won't even listen.
Constitutional Conservative
Tue Oct 13 2009 13:53
I have been drinkin milk my entire life...A lot of milk to be honest. Not once have I had a broken bone. I RARELY get sick, and when i do I beat the sickness in a day or two. I am 6'1" and weigh 170 lbs. I am built very athletically and muscular. Oh, and another thing. I grew up on a ranch where my family would run about 3500 cattle a year. I drove four-wheelers all the time. I also work with heavy farm machinery, because we farm also. I was very adventurous as a kid and did many things which could have got me hurt. I never have been seriously hurt in my life. I played football, and I put 100% effort into the game. I was starting runningback for two years. I was never hurt once. It is because of people like you that we have Obama in the white house. Oh, and i bet you think that he deserved the Nobel Peace Prized too. (Look at the polls)
Constitutional Conservative
Tue Oct 13 2009 13:43
Beth Mendenhall...Why do you have to be like this? I want to be nice to you and understand your beliefs. But this? Really? You are a waste of flesh. I am sorry for you. I truely am. May your god have mercy on your soul.
Rachel
Sat Oct 10 2009 16:40
Beth has it right, and for the rest of you ignorant college brats who think you know what your talking about, go to your local library and check out The China Study. Sheds a little light on your moms breast cancer.
Aggie1
Thu Oct 8 2009 22:00
Do you realize that you are attending one of the top agriculture schools in the nation? Or that the university that will be on your degree started as an agriculture college? Maybe you should do some real research or better yet, attend a dairy, farm or any agricultural-based business before you go venting. The Collegian's good name is on the line with your stupid editorials. I would start doing some research before you meet a whole herd of angry farm kids.
Farmer Phill
Thu Oct 1 2009 13:43
Have you ever considered that the reason humans are the only beings that drink another species milk is that we are the only beings capable of it?
Most of the problems she mentions with milk are not the fault of the milk itself, but of government interference - i.e., insisting that we consume only pasteurized milk products. Heat processing destroys the natural enzymes, including lactase that allows digestion of lactose.
Your name
Thu Oct 1 2009 08:34
The very problem with the K-state lies in its administration. These are the state inbread, living most of their lives in and around manhattan area. Can you count on them to lead the school to a better college ranking? Can you count on them to provide the state of art education and shaping students' characters? Can you count on rat boseco to lead this school to a sound name? Can you count him to teach you on how to be a better human being? man, that's like asking jesus to join the mormon. you know the answer guys. These are the very guys that run the old politics on the college campus for themselves. They don't want change. Keeping their jobs and the pay checks are their sole objectives. Good luck kids. We've got an administration way more crooked than you think. Kstate, second tiered in the state university pool, and neglected in the national university rank.






log out