College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Beatles cheapen themselves with Rock Band

By Mitchell Widener

Print this article

Published: Thursday, September 10, 2009

Updated: Thursday, September 10, 2009

Rockband

Illustration by Brianna Kerwood

Yesterday, legions of loyal fans savored the opportunity to relive Beatlemania once again. Rabid followers will be able to hear a much-anticipated remastered version of select Beatles discography, including a video game, “The Beatles: Rock Band.”

Using the latest technology, these new CDs will be clearer and crisper. Every tiny note that was fuzzy or difficult to hear will now bounce pristinely out of speakers. The harmonies will sound that much more in accord. All snaps, crackles and pops will evaporate. The sound will be the closest to perfection studio technology can let a band reach.

Yet, in all of this celebration over musical enhancement, am I the only one yearning for imperfection? Does all of this infinite tinkering strike anyone else as needless and meddlesome? Call me a traditionalist, but something just makes me uneasy about this process.

The Rock Band idea especially comes off like a desperate attempt by The Beatles to stay relevant in a technology-obsessed era. It irks me that Paul and Ringo feel the need to succumb to the conformist culture.

What spikes my consternation the most is the ever-growing trend by musicians constantly improving upon their previous works. Artists are much more unique and productive when they are creating rather than incessantly tinkering. Experimentation, not a desire for perfection, spawns great music. Outside of the music realm, no other great artists or writers felt the need to nit-pick their own work.

Twenty years after writing “Romeo and Juliet,” Shakespeare didn’t say, “Juliet should actually live. Romeo isn’t her type.” Michelangelo never took a gander up at the Sistine Chapel in his old age and decide to whiten God’s beard because it was a bit too gray.

These revisions seem like an endless cycle to satisfy the artist’s lack of fulfillment.

Maybe I’m being naïve, but I don’t think these releases are primarily financially motivated, and are, I hope, artistically driven. Recently, Paul McCartney has said the sounds he’s hearing now are what he actually heard 40 years ago in the studio. I don’t doubt that. But that isn’t what fans have been hearing for the past 40 years. By utilizing these new innovations, Paul and Ringo are probably thinking they will appeal to an audience whose mop tops haven’t been reduced by a receding hairline.

That is their biggest error in judgment.

The brilliance of The Beatles lies in their constant relevance, their timelessness. For more than 40 years, The Beatles have been discovered by each new generation of music fans without cutting-edge technology. Why is it needed now?

More than the remastered CDs, the Rock Band game strikes me as an unnecessary and unfortunate degradation of “the fab four”. One can argue that Beatle-based projects such as the movie “Across the Universe” and the Cirque du Soleil show “Love,” are art.

Meanwhile, only the classy participants on “Rock of Love” would champion Rock Band as fine art. Personally, I think Rock Band itself is basically a more pathetic version of karaoke. Granted, it is a party favorite because of its simple premise.

People know the songs, and people like the songs. I get it. The Beatles just seem more prestigious than that.

Amidst this technology-saturated, cheap-thrills culture, give me a book to read. Give me deficiencies. Give me an imperfect album. Give me true appreciation.

Speaking words of wisdom, let it be.

- Mitchell J. Widener is a sophomore in English. Please send comments to opinion@spub.ksu.edu.
 

Comments

6 comments
Brian Carter
Mon Sep 21 2009 20:31
If I was a Beatle I definetely would not support my music to be on rock band. A popular game shouldn't be what makes you enjoy a Beatles tune. Music is something much deeper and greater than any video game and captures something on the inside of someone. If you are a true Beatles fan or even a music fan..screw rock band and mainstream junk..Mitch rules.
Your name
Fri Sep 11 2009 12:07
Didn't Michael Jackson buy the rights to most of the Beatles songs a while back? Must have sold them to Rock Band for drug money. ROCK BAND ARE MURDERES, quick get Larry King and Nancy Grace on the phone, we need to blame and prosecute someone for the death of the King!
Brennan
Thu Sep 10 2009 16:00
The Rock Band Beatle's game wasn't made by Paul and Ringo, nor was it their idea. The simply gave it their blessing. The Beatles are arguably the biggest/greatest band of all time and Rock Band is one of the world's most popular game, this is simply giving Beatles fans another method to enjoy a band they love. I understand liking the sound of imperfections, but Remasters don't edit out mistakes in playing, they simply touch up poor recording quality. The remasters let the songs be heard the way the were meant to be. Besides, if all of this sparks up a new mass of Beatles fans I'll gladly embrace it considering the trash heap the music world is today.
Your name
Thu Sep 10 2009 14:25
If you have not played the Beatles Rock Band, do not judge. I don't even like Rock Band, but this was amazing! It does no damage to The Beatles whatsoever. Beatles Rock Band is more than just playing Beatles songs; there are classic pictures and videos too. Play the game.
KSU alumn 07
Thu Sep 10 2009 12:03
The discography - They don't own the rights to their music anymore. This wasn't their decision, so it in no way should reflect any "selling out" that hasn't already been done. I don't understand your problem with having the option to hear the songs the way they were intended to sound. I can certainly appreciate a low-fi aesthetic, but as a Beatles fan I'm hoping the discography will give me a new listening experience and provide further insight into the artistic vision of my dead idol.
Rock Band - Beatles "everything" has already been made. There are Beatles barstools, doormats, pool queues, the damage has been done. Don't forget the Beatles are a pop group. However lame Rock Band probably is, I think there is already an Aerosmith version, so this is a considerable step up from that on the cool scale. It's certainly not for me, but if kids like it, and appreciate the music behind it, I think it could help usher in a new generation of Beatles fans, which I don’t think is a bad thing.
Rock Band - Beatles "everything" has already been made. There are Beatles barstools, doormats, pool ques, the damage has been done. Don't forget the Beatles are a pop group. However lame Rock Band probably is, I think there is already an Aerosmith version, so this is a considerable step up from that on the cool scale. It's certainly not for me, but if kids like it, and appreciate the music behind it, I think it could help usher in a new generation of Beatles fans.
Your name
Thu Sep 10 2009 11:34
Paul and Ringo were always the 2 most commercial members as well as the weakest links. Harrison was the man most of the Beatles' best songs were written by him, Lennon was pretty cool too if you can get into the hippie mentality. Just goes to show that the most talented people always die off first. Shame.






log out