Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Communicating in other languages vital

Published: Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 07:10

asdf

Beth Mendenhall

The best cure for international conflict is the same remedy for interpersonal conflict: communication. Language reflects connections, but it also creates them. Talking openly and honestly with another person, or nation, can diffuse tensions by helping us recognize we are more similar than different.

Without communication, it's easy to demonize other people and ignore their fundamental humanity. Look at Iran. Look at illegal immigrants. These are people, just like us, simply trying to find a little happiness, just like us.

Americans need to wake up and realize it is imperative we learn other languages to diffuse both domestic and international conflict. The rest of the world is doing it — our demands for "English only" are simply rooted in xenophobia and reinforce the global perception of American exceptionalism.

A large portion of students never receive anything beyond a shallow education in foreign languages, leaving them completely incapable of non-English communication as adults.

Only one in four Americans can hold a conversation in another language, whereas one in two European citizens and eight out of 10 European students can. Regardless of the reason, that means Europeans can more effectively communicate with other cultures.

It's clear one is more apt to learn languages when young - if our public schools required a bilingual or multilingual education, the next generation could be proficient communicators with the rest of the world.

Non-romantic languages like Chinese, Hindi and Arabic are especially needed. These languages have the largest number of speakers in the world, but are also some of the least taught. Spanish ought to also be a high priority, given the influx of native speakers.

The root of English-only policies is fear of what we don't understand. It can be intimidating to be in a room full of people speaking in a language you don't know, but it's an experience recent immigrants and many new international students go through every day, and one we should use to everyone's advantage.

We ought to meet them halfway - we will try to speak your language, you should try to speak ours. Printing things in both English and Spanish, for example, can help immigrants and natives alike.

The onus should not fall solely on the rest of the world to conform to our language.

Learning new languages will facilitate the international business transactions necessary for adjusting our economy to an increasingly globalized world. It can help create connections among populations (marriages, friendships, etc.) that temper geopolitical conflict.

For example, our cultural and familial ties with Western Europe have genuinely contributed to our steady relations, despite disagreement. We desperately need those kinds of meaningful connections with both rising and waning superpowers, such as Russia, India and China. Learning how to communicate with their populations is one of the best ways to facilitate economic and social connections.

Don't be afraid to try — learning a new language is difficult, but with practice can be done in a few short years. At first I was afraid to speak Spanish, my second language, with native speakers. But after a few poorly pronounced tries, I realized many of them wanted to help me and had the patience to listen carefully and respond clearly and slowly.

Programs through the International Student Center, especially conversation partners, can be extremely rewarding.

Communication is the best cure for conflict — so let's stop demanding that the world talk to us, and start reaching out to them.


-Beth Mendenhall is a senior in political science and philosophy. She does not hate agriculture. Please send comments to opinion@spub.ksu.edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

MaryJ
Sat Nov 14 2009 14:59
I have no interest in learning Spanish, mainly because the Spanish-speaking immigrants are so arrogant and disrespectful of my language and my country, while at the same time demanding all the perks and benefits that come from living here.

Europeans speak several languages because their continent is made up of numerous different ethnic groups who all have their own languages. Being bilingual is not that useful in the "global marketplace" if you're bilingual in Norwegian and English; big deal. BTW, English is now the lingua franca of Europe precisely because it is the most common second language. Many smaller countries that are fluent in English, such as the Scandinavian nations and Holland, are in fact afraid of losing their unique languages because of the prevalence of English in their countries. T

here is nothing "xenophobic" about wanting to maintain our unique culture and language. If so, then why are the Spanish-speakers never accused of being "xenophobic" because they are so determined to hang onto their precious language, at the expense of ours? Your accusation holds no water because it is only aimed at English-speaking people; I'm sure you are one of those who sympathize when the Spanish-speakers cry, with tears in their eyes, about the importance of hanging onto their culture. Well, guess what? I have the same feelings about MY language and culture. Are my feelings about my culture and language illegitimate because I'm Anglo-Saxon and white? I'll bet you think so Beth, don't you?

I'm so sick of liberal hypocrisy.

Bill Rice Class of 1990
Fri Nov 6 2009 21:38
I took three of years of French and wish I could remember it. I liked your article, but I disgree with you with regard to calling "English Only" xenophobic. English is the predominant language of international business largely because the US has the single largest economy in the world (at least as measured on a country by country basis). India has a big leg up on its closest comeptitor, China, as it was colonized by Britian. Consequently, many Indians have already learned English.

I've often thought about learning another language but which one? French would be the easiest for me but it would only come into use when I vacation back home near Lake Champlain (near Quebec). Not much chance to use it on a regular basis so I wouldn't become fluent. Spanish? That's probably the most likely choice since it would be the easiest for me to put into practice. It would be fun, but I've got a lot on my plate.

Regardless of what language I choose, I'm not sure how being fluent in a second language would benefit me. Englishis the primary language in the US and there really aren't that many jobs in the US which require being fluent in more than one language.

Too often it seems that Europeans are thought to be more cultured than we are because they are fluent in more than one language. However, the point that is often missed is that they are polyglots out of necessity since they are surrounded by so many languages other than their native tongues.

I'm all for more eduation, but let's not attribute an English Only mentality to one which is xenophobic or uncultured. We have the benefit of having our native tongue as the primary language of international business...that's a good thing.

Your name
Mon Nov 2 2009 23:39
Dirka Dirka, Mohammed, Jihad!

I'm training for my trip to Saudi Arabia. I'm going to have a blast, pardon the pun.

It's going to be so much fun though, let's hope I keep myself together and I don't....lose my head.

Tony
Fri Oct 30 2009 11:47
Marty, do people that vacation in the U.S. learn english for their trip? Some may, but many don't. If you don't believe me, just go to Vegas for awhile.
my thoughts
Fri Oct 30 2009 03:38
in japanese.
baka
SWK!
Fri Oct 30 2009 03:02
I took four years of Spanish in a high school in Western Kansas. I can rattle off the months of the year and put together a grammatically incorrect sentence sprinkled with some spanglish. Until they start offering classes in Americanized Spanish, I will not subject myself to the amount of time it takes to learn a language. Mexicans don't speak the kind of spanish that is being taught in schools. I had plenty of classmates who were ESL students who also failed Spanish classes, and not for lack of effort. Oh, and Beth you are ridiculous, but I applaud you for broadening your horizons beyond demonizing agricultural practices. Eat a steak.
Marty
Thu Oct 29 2009 13:53
Astronaut, how about the 100,000+ college students who visit spring break hotspots in Mexico each year? Do they speak Spanish while they're in Mexico? Or, would you say they're "demanding" the native Mexicans learn "American?"
Your name
Thu Oct 29 2009 13:49
Mussolini spoke four languages fluently. Maybe if he had learned a fifth he wouldn't have been a war-mongering dictator. Maybe if Americans learned Spanish, Iran would no longer be led by Jew-hating, Holocaust-denying, Islamofascist psychos. Is this what passes for logic in the Poly Sci department???
Firefighter
Thu Oct 29 2009 04:24
Astronaut, I believe we speak English here in the good ol' USA, not "American."
Ban Beth
Thu Oct 29 2009 03:24
Shut it Beth. Persondenhall strikes again
Astronaut
Thu Oct 29 2009 03:22
This doesnt make any sense. If they want to live in AMERICA they should learn OUR language. You dont see us going to Mexico and demanding THEY learn AMERICAN DO YOU?
Pretzel
Wed Oct 28 2009 17:20
Great article Beth.
Food Sci Grad
Wed Oct 28 2009 14:09
I wish I would have had the opportunity to take Spanish in college. I work in the food industry now so many of the people I work with speak little to no english. While at K-State I could never fit a foreign language into my schedule because of the afternoon long science based labs I always had in my schedule. I think the languages department should look at allowing the basic levels to not have to be an every day class.
KC Wildcat
Wed Oct 28 2009 12:40
Our business values the bi-lingual employee.

It is too bad our school system doesn't teach foreign language at an earlier age as other countries do.
There are so many benefits.







log out