College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Egg-laying hens have tragic lives, deaths

By Beth Mendenhall

Print this article

Published: Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Beth

Beth Mendenhall

Avian intelligence has been systematically underrated until recently, as new studies indicate birds understand and remember far more than we've given them credit for. According to Lesley Rogers, professor of zoology at the University of New England, birds have cognitive capacities equivalent to those of mammals, even primates.

This cognitive capacity may be obvious to a casual observer of crows and parrots, but is also present in the chickens we raise in commercial farming operations.

Bernard Rollin, professor of animal science at Colorado State University, said "Chickens are not mindless, simple automata but are complex behaviorally, do quite well in learning, show a rich social organization and have a diverse repertoire of calls," according to Chickenindustry.com

Chris Evans, professor of psychology at Macquarie University, said chickens have the ability to understand that an object removed from their field of vision still exists, a capacity that even small children lack. Despite their intelligence, chickens are not protected by federal anti-cruelty laws.

Two common practices of the modern egg industry are an affront to human values, as they denigrate the value to life and cause extreme, yet unnecessary, suffering for the sake of an eggs Benedict. Not all egg-laying farms engage in forced molting, but almost all the hens purchased for these farms come from hatcheries that mercilessly kill thousands of newborn male chicks a day.

Hy-Line North America's hatchery for egg-laying hens in Spencer, Iowa, has come under fire recently for a video released by an undercover animal rights group, Mercy for Animals. The video shows thousands of peeping and wriggling male chicks, which are valueless to the industry because they can't lay eggs and don't provide ideal meat, being tossed into a meat grinder and churned into a bloody pulp. You can see the video at Mercyforanimals.org/hatchery.

The Iowa Hy-Line facility produces more than 33 million egg-laying hens a year, which means roughly 100,000 male chicks are mercilessly eviscerated every day at the Spencer facility alone - just one of hundreds in the U.S.

Mitch Head, spokesman for the United Egg Producers, said this is standard industry practice, according to a Sept. 1 article by the Associated Press.

Animal rights groups have documented other facilities killing male chicks by simply throwing them in trash bins where they struggle and writhe with their kin until painful suffocation ends their short lives.

There is something terribly wrong with an industry that brings millions of lives into the world only to kill them systematically.

The life of the average laying hen is extremely uncomfortable. Most hens are housed in such cramped conditions, with five to 11 hens per cage, that they're incapable of spreading their wings. Their feet are often deformed as a result of standing on wire for their entire lives. Hens naturally molt at an age of 18 to 22 months, but egg company researchers have determined production is more consistent with two periods of "controlled" molting, one at 14 months and another at 22.

The forced molt is achieved by removing all feed until a hen loses roughly 30 percent of her body weight. This means 12 days of expecting feed that never comes, according to Agribusinessweek.com. Many hens don't make it through the forced molt – starvation isn't usually good for quality of life.

Why are consumers complacent with such cruel practices committed against such intelligent animals? Because they demand the cheapest eggs. Farmers who shun practices like forced molting simply can't compete with other producers unless we pay them.

Remember every time you bite into that delicious Egg McMuffin that hundreds of male chicks are ground up alive every day, and millions of hens are subjected to short, painful lives all so you can get your breakfast sandwich. 

-Beth Mendenhall is a senior in political science and philosophy. Please send comments to opinion@spub.ksu.edu.

Comments

62 comments
Elizabeth
Mon Oct 19 2009 17:16
Beth, I'm really happy to see you writing controversial opinions! We need more voices like yours. Don't let any of the negativity get to you or stop you from making your voice heard. :) Keep up the good work!
Captain Obvious
Sun Oct 11 2009 13:12
Beth isn't forcing any of you to stop eating your poultry, she is simply trying to educate the lot of you who severely need it, so stop blaming others for your unfortunate guilt-trip the next time you eat a bucket of chicken wings from the local fast food joint.
Aggie1
Thu Oct 8 2009 22:05
Maybe you should try writing something positive about the agriculture industry...afterall, it is the industry which is responsible for feeding the world, including your uneducated self.
Reasoned Logic
Mon Oct 5 2009 13:46
Too bad they can't come up with a way to determine the sex of the chick before they hatch. Then we could just abort them before they hatch! And if a few survived after being ripped from their shells, we could just put them in a closet and wait for them to die.
Your name
Mon Oct 5 2009 12:08
wow..just..wow...shouldnt we just let the poor chickens run wild and free? then we could make a chicken hunting season..oh wait, that would be inhumane also, we should just let them over-populate until they eventually run out of food sources and die out...then we wouldnt have to worry about abusing these poor animals...Liberals, please...
Your name
Mon Oct 5 2009 01:54
I'm not going to feel bad about eating corn next am I?
Your name
Fri Oct 2 2009 18:48
not to defend beth, but so many people responding so passionately to her articles should try writing their own editorials and submitting them to the collegian.
Sick of it
Fri Oct 2 2009 17:51
Join me in not responding to Beth's articles ever again. All it does is give her more time of day than she or the Collegian deserve.
Laura
Fri Oct 2 2009 16:26
To KSU Grad:

To what benefit (to either side) is it to tell a commenter with a thoughtful post to "go away"?

You're a waste of everyone's time.

KSU Grad
Fri Oct 2 2009 14:33
To Marry Zahner: Go away
Mary Zahner, Ph.D.
Fri Oct 2 2009 12:56
Beth - you are certainly stirring up the pot! Sorting through the positive and negative comments, I find some thoughtful ideas, such as visiting a local poultry industry or talking more to the people at the College of Agriculture about the good things they are doing. I look past the comments written by 'juveniles' who are probably wasting their money on education because they are incapable of expanding their thinking, becoming tolerant of ideas contrary to theirs, or articulating a thoughtful dissent.
Class of 1989
Thu Oct 1 2009 19:19
Seems the Universtiy Daily Kansan has lost its idiot.
Your name
Thu Oct 1 2009 15:58
I am curious about the connections that Beth makes to make her "points". Just because chickens supposedly have a notion of object permanence, this fact alone makes them "intelligent"? And as far as this lacking in small children, this capacity has been measured in infants at around 8 to 9 months, and as young as 3 months old! A chicken is intelligent because it has one common trait with an infant? Does that mean infants are intelligent too?
I'm appalled the Collegian lets her articles run with a clear lack of research and knowledge of the subject on her part.
Alex
Thu Oct 1 2009 12:18
Don't kill the hemp plants to make your clothes! They have feelings too!!!
Your name
Thu Oct 1 2009 11:10
Let's get to the point: Beth doesn't agree with a commercialized agricultural industry. I am not going to argue with you, but stop beating around the bush by saying things just to aggravate people. We attend a Land Grant University that is widely known for the College of Agriculture. I think you are putting all of your focus on the negative aspects of agriculture without the consideration of efforts being made right here on campus, namely in the College of Agriculture, to make the system more kosher and help local farmers, all while feeding people all over the world. If you were to direct you efforts towards the downfalls of large corporations, you may get a little more support. Leaving out things like "churned into a bloody pulp" may help get a few of us in agriculture (the ones who work in the field) on your side. With more on your side, there is much more of a chance to make a difference if you truly wanted to for the said causes.
Reasoned thought
Thu Oct 1 2009 09:26
Susan A. Jones:
We can feed the world NOW, if only dictators and despots the world over would let us deliver the food!
Your name
Thu Oct 1 2009 07:07
If you want to hear more discussion - tune into Black Sky Radio - Nightmare and Nivens on the internet at 4:30 pm on Friday.
Your name
Thu Oct 1 2009 00:10
i hate eggs
daniel
Wed Sep 30 2009 21:14
i dare you to take ASI 102.
Your name
Wed Sep 30 2009 19:47
I'm curious if you've ever actually been to a local poultry industry or are just going off the pratice of o group of them? Each one is run differently than the next. Very rarely are animals "wasted" or in your terms being sufficated in barrels. The process it takes to lay the egg, incubate it, hatch it, and feed it til they can tell the sex is to much work to just throw it away. You need to take a trip to the K-state poultry industry and see how things are done around here before you go talk about a process that you know nothing about. Just having facts and sources do not give you the right to disregard how a process that you have never personally witnessed is completed. Experience the information in an article before you write it.






log out