Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Research on bullying ridiculous

Published: Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Updated: Thursday, May 6, 2010 07:05

5-6-10

Erin Logan

Once again, research dollars have been put to brilliant use, providing us with a scientific study that could have been authored by Captain Obvious.

A study conducted at the Center for Human Growth and Development at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor has concluded that fat kids are at a higher risk of being bullied than average-sized kids.

No kidding.

I often wonder about studies like this. It seems like every month there's a paper being published that tells people something they already know. I wonder how much money is wasted on this crap. I wonder how the authors of these studies could possibly think it prudent to waste time and money on them. Did the author of this study grow up home schooled or under a rock? Of course fat kids get teased by bullies. Everybody knows that, you moron.

Even if you did grow up under a rock and truly had no experience being bullied, being a bully or just observing them, you could still figure out the fat kid is going to be the best target by watching movies and television. "The Lord of the Flies," "Heavy Weights," "Angus," or anything with John Candy or Chris Farley in it would tell you that fat people are to be laughed at, whether they're funny or not.

I don't think this is going to be an issue for long, though, because the number of fat kids is skyrocketing in this country. According to KidsHealth.org, one in three American kids is now considered overweight or obese. One in three.

When I was growing up, I was the only fat kid in all of the schools I attended until about seventh grade. I can't help but feel I was born in the wrong generation. Fat kids these days have it easier because there are so many of them, and they're getting more plentiful every day. They have backup. They provide multiple targets for bullies, meaning they can hide while some other fat kid gets picked on. Or maybe the bullies have to start cycling through them on a weekly schedule to make sure they're all accounted for.

At any rate, if the obesity trend continues, fat kids will be more common than skinny ones. Skinny will be the minority, the abnormality. Will the tables turn? Will fat kids turn into the bullies for all the skinny kids? Why doesn't somebody do a study on that?

Regardless of whether fat kids take over the schools or not, there will always be teasing, name-calling and hurt feelings in our schools. Kids will always be teased because they're too fat, thin, ugly, poor or just plain stupid. And the ones branded as "bullies" are not the only culprits in school. They all do it. It's human nature for kids to establish a pecking order, and no amount of counseling or feel-good TV shows about expressing feelings and resolving conflicts through talking will ever change that.

Researchers, please stop wasting time and money on pointless studies that tell us things we already know. Go research something more important, and leave the fat kids to do their revenge plotting on their own.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

8 comments Log in to Comment

Anonymous
Sun Dec 4 2011 14:21
I am interested in learning more about academic research on bullying. Specifically, what types of kids are more likely to be the bullies? What percentage of the bullying kids grow up to become attorneys? In other words, were today's attorneys at one time the bullying kids? If so, what percentage of today's attorneys were the bullying kids back in grade school and/or high school? Now, there's something I would like to know. Contact me at chachaangelina@yahoo.com
Anonymous
Fri May 7 2010 17:54
More grant money wasted.....
More fun with correlations!
Thu May 6 2010 22:02
No, I am not stating the obvious. I am highlighting the importance of evidence (academic, tested data that can be replicated by others and produce the same results) that SUPPORT the anecdotal evidence that we call "obvious". The reasons why grants are given - after all, there is a long, detailed selection process that is very competitive for scarce academic funding resources - is because the evidence is needed to either confirm or deny the anecdotal, "common sense" assumptions of the general public (at least in social research - biology, medicine, chemistry, etc. have a different following). Had the study shown that there was no connection between obesity and bullying, then this column would not have been written, and Karen's experience would have been an outlier, not a trend. And you, my friends, would not be shouting that something is "obvious". Funny, because academic research has, in fact, enabled more students to attend college because of the "obvious" connection between higher education and higher economic revenues, thus allowing for the passage of better student loan and grant programs...but surely that was obvious at the time. 'Cause surely no one argued against such obvious correlations...
Anonymous
Thu May 6 2010 17:14
Hahaha...so did you just attack these bullying studies while quoting a KidsHealth.org study about obesity? How does it feel to be an absolute failure in a dying career field?
duh
Thu May 6 2010 15:43
Anonymous is correct. Obvoiusly Correlations did not read the article, or otherwise just missed the whole point of it. Stating the obvious is a waste of research. You might as well publish a research paper stating that children are shorter than adults, or sofas are designed for sitting upon.
Anonymous
Thu May 6 2010 14:34
Hey "Correlations are fun!". When you say "it demonstrates that 1 in 3 kids aren't JUST overweight, they are ALSO at risk for more extreme bullying". You are STATING THE OBVIOUS!!!! Did you really need to spend all that grant money to figure out that little gem of knowledge???????
Correlations are fun!
Thu May 6 2010 10:14
So, here's a little secret from inside academia, Karen - researchers "waste" money on these studies because anecdotal evidence does not stand up in courts and legislation.
For example, while you may have been bullied in school, no one cares because it is *just* your personal experience. We might feel bad for you, but nothing will come of it. However, if we find that the majority of kids facing extreme cultures of bullying, in which physical and emotional pain often leads to higher rates of suicide, eating disorders, anxiety, and depression, then it becomes a social problem, not *just* a personal one. And this research is important, because it demonstrates that 1 in 3 kids aren't JUST overweight, they are ALSO at risk for more extreme bullying.
If you're still having trouble making the connections, then go back to the research process and find the deluge of articles highlighting the risk of being gay or lesbian in elementary, middle, and high school with regard to bullying. Then go look up the body count that goes along with the research. THEN, tell me why researchers might care about data that you find anecdotal and irrelevant.
annoyed
Thu May 6 2010 09:15
Why don't you actually write about something important?

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In