Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Patients should have right to make euthanasia decision

Published: Thursday, February 12, 2009

Updated: Thursday, February 12, 2009 02:02

euthenasia

Christina Klein

Instead of arguing whether euthanasia is a good or bad thing, we should leave the choice to those concerned.

America is the land of the free, yet in this society certain morals are placed above a person's right to life or death. Tens of thousands of terminally ill patients are slowly wasting away in hospital beds around the country, and those courageous souls are fighting a losing battle while suffering immense pain. Why aren't they afforded the option of ending their lives in a safe medical environment if they so choose?

The Constitution states all men have an inalienable right to life, but nowhere does it state that one must continue to live until they die naturally. The ability to prolong life against powerful diseases is a testament to our medical achievements, but we should never allow the ability to be exercised against a patient's will. Doctors need to adjust their moral compasses and focus on the patients' wishes, instead of constantly attempting to test new medicines and the human body's reaction. It might seem that I am staking a claim to a gray area here, but that is exactly how it should be looked at.

In addition to the suffering of people with terminal illnesses is the pain their family and friends feel. They have to juggle hospital trips, taking time from work and returning each day to see a loved one slip away. Being afforded the option to end a life with humility allows everyone the opportunity to make their amends, say their goodbyes and be at peace with their lives instead of waking each day and wondering if it will be the last.

While finances are the last thing someone in this situation wants to bother with, hospital bills are unmerciful. Medical insurance companies have caps on the amount of money they will provide, and debt piles up. There is no humanity in racking up incredible amounts of debt to be shouldered by the survivors of a terminally ill patient simply because a doctor feels morally obligated to prolonging a life.

Basically, it is not about being pro-life or pro-death but instead about the an individual's right to choose. If people have money and want to live as long as medically possible, that it is their choice; but if not, it should be their choice as well.

America's success in the world has resulted from the individual's right to choose. We choose where and how we live and what to do with our lives. Our place as the most powerful country in the world was earned through the ability to make choices. Euthanasia is simply offering someone a choice — there is nothing more American than that.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments Log in to Comment

Amanda
Mon Aug 24 2009 08:26
I agree with your editorial. I think it's unbelievable the amount of people who suffer unnecessarily until the bitter end. I think if a patient has lived their life, and they're dying, they should be allowed a peaceful, painless death as an option. Yesterday I was working in a Nursing Care Facility yesterday doing Occupational Therapy, and one of the patients on my caseload was very ill, very frail, and visibly in pain. Yet the facility is making money by giving her physical and occupational therapy... for what? It just seemed like torture to me... I asked her in the afternoon twice if she wanted to go with me to the gym, as I'm required to do because she's on therapy, and she declined both times. I felt bad just asking. We have so many life-prolonging measures now (G-tubes, Oxygen tanks) that in this country one can expect to be able to live their last days or months or years out as a lifeless vegetable if they so choose... why is it that one can't also choose to die when they're ready?
William Miller
Sat Feb 14 2009 10:32
As usual this topic has strong feelings on each side. As for Ms. Dore's comments, I agree this process can be abused, but that's why you need oversight to see and address these possibilities. I truly feel the vast majority of people who would choose euthanasia to end suffering, would be doing so by their own desire. There will be those trying to "profit", but holding back those requesting this because of a few is simply wrong. Having watched death slowly take several loved ones, and even a few that I was with until that last breath, we need to do something better. I feel we need to respect those that are dying and allow them the choice as to how they will die. Take religion and legality issues off the table and look at this as a basic human right... To die with dignity.
Margaret Dore
Thu Feb 12 2009 21:59
I am an attorney in Washington State, where assisted suicide was recently legalized. I disagree with this editorial.

In Washington State, clever marketing encouraged voters to believe that they were voting for autonomy and choice. Our new law is instead a recipe for elder abuse or perhaps, more bluntly, a new, more efficient wealth transfer mechanism. Key provisions of our law include that your heir, who will benefit from your death, is allowed to help you sign up for the lethal dose.

Protect yourselves and your family. Don’t let legalized assisted suicide/euthanasia come to Kansas.

Margaret K. Dore
Law Offices of Margaret K. Dore, P.S.
www.margaretdore.com
1001 4th Avenue, 44th Floor
Seattle, WA 98154
206 389 1754

Your name
Thu Feb 12 2009 15:49
Anyone who supports the "Last Human Right" © should be aware of Final Exit Network - www.finalexitnetwork.org. The mission of Final Exit Network is to serve people who are suffering intolerably from an irreversible condition which has become more than they can bear.

Jim Moore
Communications & Membership
Final Exit Network
P. O. Box 965005
Marietta, GA 30066
(800) 524 - EXIT (3948)
www.finalexitnetwork.org
finalexitnetwork@commulinks.com

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In